
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌128.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌128.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
- ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 7100 better than T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does T1000 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7100 and T1000

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

T1000
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,701 | 7,649 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+129% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1395 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 896 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the T1000's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 156mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.2 | 153.0+158% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The T1000 costs 56.2% less ($449 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the T1000 offers 128.1% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $350-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 21.9+128% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #331 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












