GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 6400

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6400

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7714

G3D Mark Score

7728

Performance Difference

Radeon RX 6400 is 0.2% faster than GeForce RTX 2050

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce RTX 20504096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
24%
low77%
medium44%
high16%
ultra6%
1440pLow
12%
low44%
medium16%
high6%
ultra6%
4KLimited
7%
low16%
medium6%
high6%
ultra6%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 7,714 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon RX 64004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
25%
low78%
medium45%
high17%
ultra7%
1440pLow
13%
low45%
medium17%
high7%
ultra7%
4KLimited
8%
low17%
medium7%
high7%
ultra7%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 7,728 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon RX 6400 performs 0.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce RTX 2050 and Radeon RX 6400.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce RTX 2050 and Radeon RX 6400

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2050

The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It includes 46 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:184
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:2.9 MB
L2 Cache:4 MB
Core Clock:1515 MHz
Boost Clock:1710 MHz
Tensor Cores:368
Shading Units:2944
Transistor Count:13,600 million
Ray Tracing Cores:46
Texture Fill Rate:314.6
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):215 Watt
Floating Point Performance:10.07 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU104
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Launch Price:$699
Release Date:September 20 2018
Performance Ranking Position:94
AMD

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It includes 12 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:4096 MB
L0 Cache:192 kB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
L3 Cache:16 MB
Core Clock:1923 MHz
Boost Clock:2321 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:5,400 million
Ray Tracing Cores:12
Texture Fill Rate:111.4
Manufacturing Process:6 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):53 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.565 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 24
Architecture:RDNA 2.0 (2020βˆ’2025)
Launch Price:$159
Release Date:January 19 2022
Performance Ranking Position:330

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 and Radeon RX 6400