G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
25.2% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌135.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 53W.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 125W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

2020

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 125W, a 72W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6400 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
25.2% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌135.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 53W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5500 XT better than Radeon RX 6400?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon Pro 5500 XT averages 5.8% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,910 vs 7,728 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6400 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $159 MSRP. Radeon Pro 5500 XT is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro 5500 XT is about 25.2% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 5.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6400 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (53W vs 125W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 6400 make more sense than Radeon Pro 5500 XT?

Yes. Radeon RX 6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (53W vs 125W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $159 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5500 XT. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5500 XT currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark and 5.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon RX 6400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	83 FPS	104 FPS
medium	72 FPS	92 FPS
high	61 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	73 FPS	94 FPS
medium	64 FPS	80 FPS
high	49 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	45 FPS
medium	26 FPS	42 FPS
high	17 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	28 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5500 XT Open Radeon RX 6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	136 FPS	158 FPS
medium	102 FPS	124 FPS
high	74 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	60 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	104 FPS
medium	61 FPS	81 FPS
high	45 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	53 FPS
medium	30 FPS	41 FPS
high	25 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	20 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5500 XT Open Radeon RX 6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	350 FPS	329 FPS
medium	285 FPS	278 FPS
high	237 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	178 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	267 FPS	232 FPS
medium	214 FPS	208 FPS
high	178 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	134 FPS
medium	142 FPS	121 FPS
high	103 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5500 XT Open Radeon RX 6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	156 FPS	251 FPS
medium	123 FPS	186 FPS
high	104 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	116 FPS	192 FPS
medium	93 FPS	139 FPS
high	79 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	101 FPS
medium	50 FPS	74 FPS
high	39 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	50 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5500 XT Open Radeon RX 6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Radeon RX 6400

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 2321 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score	7,910+2%	7,728
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.398 TFLOPS+51%	3.565 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1757 MHz	2321 MHz+32%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+100%	48
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
Encoder	VCN 2.0	None
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 80.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5500 XT	Radeon RX 6400
TDP	125W	53W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	172mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	63.3	145.8+130%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 20.1% less ($40 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 22.4% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).