
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290 / 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 24.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon R9 290 / 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅27.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌65.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Radeon R9 290 / 390
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 24.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 300W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅27.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 290 / 390 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌65.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌140% higher power demand at 300W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 290 / 390 better than Radeon Pro 5500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5500 XT make more sense than Radeon R9 290 / 390?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 92 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500 XT and Radeon R9 290 / 390

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.

Radeon R9 290 / 390
Radeon R9 290 / 390
The Radeon R9 290 / 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,150 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 7,910 and the Radeon R9 290 / 390 reaches 8,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,910 | 8,150+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+5% | 5.12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+76% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290 / 390).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 290 / 390's 300W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290 / 390). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-58% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 275mm |
| Height | — | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 63.3+133% | 27.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290 / 390 launched at $329. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 39.5% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) vs 24.8 (Radeon R9 290 / 390) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers 60.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500 XT | Radeon R9 290 / 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-40% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+60% | 24.8 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Grenada |
| Release | August 4 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #322 | #296 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













