G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅54.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅54.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6300M better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro WX 7130 averages 54.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,421 vs 6,406 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6300M is a 2022 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon Pro WX 7130 is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6300M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 6300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $1,000 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 7130 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 7130 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 7130 is 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 6,406 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 7130 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	104 FPS	104 FPS
medium	88 FPS	92 FPS
high	76 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	94 FPS
medium	75 FPS	80 FPS
high	57 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	45 FPS
medium	32 FPS	42 FPS
high	21 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	28 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7130 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	182 FPS	158 FPS
medium	160 FPS	124 FPS
high	130 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	133 FPS	104 FPS
medium	111 FPS	81 FPS
high	90 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	53 FPS
medium	64 FPS	41 FPS
high	52 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	20 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7130 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	288 FPS	289 FPS
medium	231 FPS	231 FPS
high	192 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	216 FPS	217 FPS
medium	173 FPS	173 FPS
high	144 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	133 FPS
medium	115 FPS	116 FPS
high	96 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7130 Open Radeon RX 6300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	248 FPS	257 FPS
medium	215 FPS	191 FPS
high	175 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	141 FPS
1440p
low	188 FPS	191 FPS
medium	165 FPS	138 FPS
high	129 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	100 FPS
medium	85 FPS	74 FPS
high	67 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	50 FPS

Open Radeon Pro WX 7130 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Radeon RX 6300M

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,406	6,421
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+200%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.728 TFLOPS+55%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1243 MHz	2400 MHz+93%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144+200%	48
L1 Cache	576 KB+125%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+300%	32-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7130	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	VCE 3.4	—
Decoder	UVD 6.3	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.