
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

T600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌225% higher power demand at 130W vs 40W.
T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 401.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 130W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016T600
2021Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 401.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 130W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌225% higher power demand at 130W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is T600 better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7130 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and T600

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

T600
T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,425 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+260% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+235% | 1.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1335 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+260% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 640 KB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T600 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the T600's 40W — a 105.9% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 40W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 160.6+226% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the T600 launched at $200. The T600 costs 80% less ($800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 401.6% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $200-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.4 | 32.1+402% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #331 | #378 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












