
Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅31.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅31.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX Vega M GH: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX Vega M GH better than Radeon Pro WX 7130?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 7130 make more sense than Radeon RX Vega M GH?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7130 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 scores 6,406 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,406 | 6,548+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS+57% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz+4% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+50% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+50% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.3 | 65.5+33% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($1000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7130 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Polaris 22 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #331 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












