
Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 480: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 480 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 480
2016Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 480: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 480 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580 better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 480 and Radeon RX 580

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 480 scores 8,546 and the Radeon RX 580 reaches 8,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 480) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,546 | 8,799+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.834 TFLOPS | 6.175 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz | 1340 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 480 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 480) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 480 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 480) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 95mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.0+20% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 2.9% better value. The Radeon RX 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.3 | 38.4+3% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Polaris 20 |
| Release | June 29 2016 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #305 | #301 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












