
Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌27.9% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 480
2016Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌27.9% HIGHER MSRP$229 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 480 and Radeon RX 5500

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 480 scores 8,546 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 480) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,546 | 8,837+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+64% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.834 TFLOPS+12% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz | 1845 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 480 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 480 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 480. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+14% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 480) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 480 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 480) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 110W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 180mm |
| Height | 95mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.0 | 80.3+41% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 21.8% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 32.4% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $179-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.3 | 49.4+32% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 29 2016 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #305 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












