
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 272mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 36.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅22.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
- ❌13.3% longer card at 272mm vs 240mm.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 272mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅22.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 36.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
- ❌13.3% longer card at 272mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 XT better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7600 make more sense than Radeon RX 5700 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 182 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon RX 5700 XT

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT reaches 16,183 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1905 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443+2% | 16,183 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+28% | 1905 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700 XT) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5700 XT's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 272mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 272mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+76% | 71.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT launched at $449. The Radeon RX 5700 XT costs 25% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 36.0 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 XT offers 30.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $449-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 36.0+31% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #123 | #128 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












