
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅25.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7600
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅25.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 153 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile reaches 16,940 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1657 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 16,940+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3328+63% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+47% | 1657 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+23% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 97.1% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 45W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5 | 376.4+198% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GB206 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #123 | #156 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












