
Radeon 8050S
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌49.8% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 40.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
Radeon 8050S
2025Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌49.8% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 40.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7600 better than Radeon 8050S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8050S make more sense than Radeon PRO W7600?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 584 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 418 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 315 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8050S and Radeon PRO W7600

Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
The Radeon 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,259 points.

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8050S scores 16,259 and the Radeon PRO W7600 reaches 16,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon 8050S) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,259 | 16,443+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+15% | 2440 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8050S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon 8050S) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon 8050S. Bus width: System Shared vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s (Max)+14% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8050S) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8050S) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8050S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8050S draws 55W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 81.1% difference. The Radeon 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8050S) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-58% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.6+134% | 126.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8050S launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. The Radeon 8050S costs 33.2% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.6 (Radeon 8050S) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the Radeon 8050S offers 47.6% better value. The Radeon 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-33% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.6+48% | 27.5 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #126 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












