
Radeon 8050S
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅37.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Radeon 8050S
2025RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅37.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile better than Radeon 8050S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon 8050S still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 278 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 153 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8050S and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
The Radeon 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,259 points.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8050S scores 16,259 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile reaches 16,940 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon 8050S) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon 8050S) vs 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1657 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon 8050S) vs 26 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 104.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,259 | 16,940+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3328+63% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+4% | 11.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+69% | 1657 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+23% | 104 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 32 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+23% | 26 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 8050S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8050S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System Shared vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8050S) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 32 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8050S) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8050S) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8050S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8050S draws 55W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 20% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8050S) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 45W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.6 | 376.4+27% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












