
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

RTX A5000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RTX A5000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅71.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023RTX A5000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅71.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5000 Mobile better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7600 make more sense than RTX A5000 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 735 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 184 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and RTX A5000 Mobile

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000 Mobile
The RTX A5000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the RTX A5000 Mobile reaches 16,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A5000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 6,144 (RTX A5000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 16,340 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+55% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A5000 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (RTX A5000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A5000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the RTX A5000 Mobile's 150W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (RTX A5000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-13% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+16% | 108.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #123 | #124 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












