
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 LE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600 LE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌15.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 132W.
Radeon RX 6600 LE
2023Why buy it
- ✅14.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 132W instead of 180W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Radeon RX 6600 LE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅14.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 132W instead of 180W, a 48W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 LE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600 LE is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌15.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 41.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 132W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600 LE better than Radeon RX 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 155 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 143 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and Radeon RX 6600 LE

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon RX 6600 LE
Radeon RX 6600 LE
The Radeon RX 6600 LE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the Radeon RX 6600 LE reaches 13,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6600 LE uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2495 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296+4% | 13,758 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 8.942 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2495 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6600 LE is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the Radeon RX 5700 tops out at FSR Frame Generation.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600 LE).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6600 LE's 132W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600 LE). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 270mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 132W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 270mm | 190mm |
| Height | 110mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 104.2+31% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600 LE launched at $329. The Radeon RX 6600 LE costs 13.2% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 41.8 (Radeon RX 6600 LE) — the Radeon RX 6600 LE offers 10.9% better value. The Radeon RX 6600 LE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | Radeon RX 6600 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | $329-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7 | 41.8+11% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #167 | #176 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













