G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 270mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅58.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
154.4% HIGHER MSRP
$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
❌17.9% longer card at 270mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 270mm, a 41mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅58.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌
154.4% HIGHER MSRP
$379 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
❌17.9% longer card at 270mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 5700 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 58.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 81.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 81.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 5700 is about 154.4% more expensive on MSRP at $379 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 58.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 81.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 5700 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 5700 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	94 FPS	149 FPS
medium	83 FPS	132 FPS
high	70 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	129 FPS
medium	74 FPS	105 FPS
high	60 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	76 FPS
medium	39 FPS	64 FPS
high	27 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	136 FPS	262 FPS
medium	113 FPS	220 FPS
high	94 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	159 FPS
medium	62 FPS	133 FPS
high	44 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	87 FPS
medium	27 FPS	73 FPS
high	21 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	323 FPS	643 FPS
medium	283 FPS	515 FPS
high	205 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	482 FPS
medium	202 FPS	386 FPS
high	151 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	241 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	322 FPS
medium	117 FPS	257 FPS
high	79 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	161 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
1080p
low	261 FPS	427 FPS
medium	211 FPS	358 FPS
high	191 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	255 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	357 FPS
medium	158 FPS	302 FPS
high	135 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	193 FPS
medium	74 FPS	155 FPS
high	65 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	115 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 5700

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 5700

The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the Radeon RX 5700 leads by 81.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
G3D Mark Score	7,869	14,296+82%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	7.949 TFLOPS+166%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1725 MHz+4%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 250% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	448 GB/s+250%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5700
TDP	75W-58%	180W
Recommended PSU	300W-50%	600W
Power Connector	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	229mm	270mm
Height	111mm	110mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+32%	79.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 60.7% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 40.1% better value.