G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 8,857).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX 5600M

2020

Why buy it

✅+12.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon RX 5600M

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+12.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 8,857).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5600M better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Radeon RX 5600M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 12.6% higher PassMark G3D performance and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, 12.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 5600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 12.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 5600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 5600M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	94 FPS	103 FPS
medium	83 FPS	90 FPS
high	70 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	92 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	60 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	30 FPS
medium	39 FPS	28 FPS
high	27 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	136 FPS	220 FPS
medium	113 FPS	186 FPS
high	94 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	149 FPS
medium	62 FPS	121 FPS
high	44 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	80 FPS
medium	27 FPS	65 FPS
high	21 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	35 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	323 FPS	399 FPS
medium	283 FPS	319 FPS
high	205 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	199 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	299 FPS
medium	202 FPS	239 FPS
high	151 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	149 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	199 FPS
medium	117 FPS	159 FPS
high	79 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	261 FPS	283 FPS
medium	211 FPS	242 FPS
high	191 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	162 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	211 FPS
medium	158 FPS	191 FPS
high	135 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	122 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	119 FPS
medium	74 FPS	101 FPS
high	65 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	65 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon RX 5600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 5600M

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 5600M

The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 8,857 — the Radeon RX 5600M leads by 12.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1265 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
G3D Mark Score	7,869	8,857+13%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.829 TFLOPS+95%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+32%	1265 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600M has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600M) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the Radeon RX 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	288 GB/s+125%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon RX 5600M
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-22%	90°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+78%	59.0