
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5600 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌87.2% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5600 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌87.2% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 XT better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 151 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon RX 5600 XT

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
The Radeon RX 5600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,453 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 13,453 — the Radeon RX 5600 XT leads by 71%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5600 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.188 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 13,453+71% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 7.188 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+7% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — a 162.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the Radeon RX 5600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 336 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5600 XT's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5600 XT). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+17% | 89.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5600 XT launched at $279. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 46.6% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 48.2 (Radeon RX 5600 XT) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 9.5% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-47% | $279 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+10% | 48.2 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 10 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #323 | #187 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













