Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 5600

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017Core: 1138 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5600

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1265 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • 7.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 74.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.3 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Radeon RX 5600

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 56 better than Radeon RX 5600?
Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro Vega 56 averages 7.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 12,104 vs 11,753 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon RX 5600 is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 5600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of Unknown, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 7nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is about 74.2% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 7.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 5600 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon RX 5600 make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Yes. Radeon RX 5600 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (150W vs 210W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Vega 56. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Vega 56 currently gives you 3.0% higher G3D Mark and 7.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon RX 5600 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
1080p
low95 FPS80 FPS
medium82 FPS70 FPS
high70 FPS58 FPS
ultra48 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS72 FPS
medium68 FPS63 FPS
high53 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS30 FPS
4K
low31 FPS27 FPS
medium28 FPS25 FPS
high22 FPS17 FPS
ultra19 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
1080p
low267 FPS211 FPS
medium227 FPS179 FPS
high178 FPS129 FPS
ultra144 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low189 FPS144 FPS
medium162 FPS119 FPS
high132 FPS88 FPS
ultra105 FPS63 FPS
4K
low100 FPS79 FPS
medium83 FPS66 FPS
high71 FPS52 FPS
ultra55 FPS36 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
1080p
low485 FPS529 FPS
medium417 FPS423 FPS
high363 FPS353 FPS
ultra272 FPS264 FPS
1440p
low386 FPS397 FPS
medium327 FPS317 FPS
high272 FPS264 FPS
ultra204 FPS198 FPS
4K
low245 FPS264 FPS
medium202 FPS212 FPS
high160 FPS176 FPS
ultra123 FPS132 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
1080p
low176 FPS247 FPS
medium144 FPS210 FPS
high123 FPS173 FPS
ultra104 FPS145 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS192 FPS
medium107 FPS170 FPS
high92 FPS135 FPS
ultra78 FPS111 FPS
4K
low73 FPS105 FPS
medium61 FPS88 FPS
high47 FPS71 FPS
ultra37 FPS56 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon RX 5600

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 5600

The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1265 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
G3D Mark Score
12,104+3%
11,753
Architecture
GCN 5.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
3584+56%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.96 TFLOPS+54%
5.829 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1265 MHz+1%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
224+56%
144
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
TDP
210W
150W-29%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
57.6
78.4+36%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 5600 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 69.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 5600
MSRP
$399
$229-43%
Performance per Dollar
30.3
51.3+69%
Codename
Vega 10
Navi 10
Release
August 14 2017
July 7 2020
Ranking
#222
#295