
Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅67.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5500M
2019RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅67.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A400 better than Radeon RX 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5500M and RTX A400

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5500M scores 5,954 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1762 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,954 | 5,983 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+83% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+71% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 1762 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+267% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A400 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5500M draws 85W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5500M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 50W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0 | 119.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5500M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $135 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GA107 |
| Release | October 7 2019 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #400 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













