
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅12.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅12.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 5,954+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1408+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1645 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5300M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9 | 70.0+2% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













