
Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅62.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅62.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,853 | 6,012+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.2 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+169% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 2100 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-15% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 68.9+15% | 60.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5300M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #403 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













