Radeon Pro 5300M vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅49.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5300M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅49.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5300M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A400 better than Radeon Pro 5300M?

Yes. RTX A400 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 2.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2024 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX A400 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. RTX A400 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $135 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5300M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if RTX A400 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 5300M Benchmark Check

RTX A400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
1080p
low	77 FPS	36 FPS
medium	67 FPS	25 FPS
high	53 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	69 FPS	29 FPS
medium	60 FPS	18 FPS
high	42 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	10 FPS
medium	24 FPS	7 FPS
high	15 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	3 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300M Open RTX A400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
1080p
low	117 FPS	73 FPS
medium	82 FPS	48 FPS
high	56 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	78 FPS	46 FPS
medium	47 FPS	25 FPS
high	34 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	23 FPS
medium	25 FPS	14 FPS
high	20 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	8 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300M Open RTX A400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
1080p
low	263 FPS	269 FPS
medium	211 FPS	215 FPS
high	176 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	202 FPS
medium	158 FPS	162 FPS
high	132 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	132 FPS	126 FPS
medium	105 FPS	108 FPS
high	88 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	55 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300M Open RTX A400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
1080p
low	141 FPS	147 FPS
medium	113 FPS	117 FPS
high	97 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	79 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	108 FPS
medium	85 FPS	87 FPS
high	73 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	59 FPS	63 FPS
medium	47 FPS	50 FPS
high	38 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	29 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5300M Open RTX A400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5300M and RTX A400

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5300M scores 5,853 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1762 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	5,853	5,983+2%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.2 TFLOPS+18%	2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1250 MHz	1762 MHz+41%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A400 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5300M	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5300M draws 85W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.