G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅347.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 41.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
❌51.6% longer card at 235mm vs 155mm.

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 155mm instead of 235mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

✅347.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 41.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 155mm instead of 235mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
❌51.6% longer card at 235mm vs 155mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 550?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM averages 347.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 2,674 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon RX 550 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017, 344.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is about 215.2% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $79 MSRP, and you are getting 347.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 344.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 550 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon RX 550 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon RX 550 is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 2,674 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 550 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
1080p
low	130 FPS	40 FPS
medium	113 FPS	26 FPS
high	99 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	28 FPS
medium	96 FPS	17 FPS
high	81 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	10 FPS
medium	57 FPS	6 FPS
high	39 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 550

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
1080p
low	239 FPS	76 FPS
medium	206 FPS	47 FPS
high	164 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	23 FPS
medium	135 FPS	17 FPS
high	112 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	6 FPS
medium	74 FPS	4 FPS
high	62 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 550

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
1080p
low	535 FPS	120 FPS
medium	428 FPS	96 FPS
high	357 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	60 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	90 FPS
medium	321 FPS	72 FPS
high	268 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	60 FPS
medium	214 FPS	48 FPS
high	178 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 550

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
1080p
low	467 FPS	120 FPS
medium	414 FPS	96 FPS
high	335 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	60 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	90 FPS
medium	321 FPS	72 FPS
high	236 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	54 FPS
medium	175 FPS	41 FPS
high	150 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open Radeon RX 550

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 550

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 550's 2,674 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 344.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score	11,892+345%	2,674
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+400%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS+642%	1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1755 MHz+48%	1183 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+1823%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 550 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s+100%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
DirectX	12.2+2%	12_0
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.4
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 235mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	Radeon RX 550
TDP	130W	50W-62%
Recommended PSU	450W	300W-33%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	235mm	155mm
Height	124mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	91.5+71%	53.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. The Radeon RX 550 costs 68.3% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 41.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).