GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R9 Fury

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970

2014Core: 1050 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 970

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Delivers 69% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 36.9% longer card at 267mm vs 195mm.

Radeon R9 Fury

2015

Why buy it

  • Measures 195mm instead of 267mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 66.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $549 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.3 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 970 better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 9,640 vs 9,521 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 970 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (150W vs 275W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 970 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 970 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $329 MSRP. GeForce GTX 970 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 970 is about $220 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and you are getting 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 Fury is the newer 2015 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon R9 Fury make more sense than GeForce GTX 970?
Yes. Radeon R9 Fury is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $549 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 970. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 970 currently gives you 1.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 69%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low81 FPS92 FPS
medium69 FPS80 FPS
high58 FPS65 FPS
ultra38 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS76 FPS
medium62 FPS66 FPS
high46 FPS49 FPS
ultra29 FPS33 FPS
4K
low26 FPS30 FPS
medium24 FPS27 FPS
high17 FPS20 FPS
ultra14 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low185 FPS243 FPS
medium152 FPS205 FPS
high122 FPS162 FPS
ultra92 FPS133 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS176 FPS
medium102 FPS145 FPS
high81 FPS121 FPS
ultra60 FPS94 FPS
4K
low63 FPS98 FPS
medium50 FPS80 FPS
high46 FPS65 FPS
ultra37 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low405 FPS428 FPS
medium347 FPS343 FPS
high289 FPS286 FPS
ultra217 FPS214 FPS
1440p
low325 FPS321 FPS
medium260 FPS257 FPS
high217 FPS214 FPS
ultra163 FPS161 FPS
4K
low210 FPS214 FPS
medium174 FPS171 FPS
high129 FPS143 FPS
ultra95 FPS107 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
1080p
low179 FPS197 FPS
medium138 FPS164 FPS
high120 FPS148 FPS
ultra103 FPS117 FPS
1440p
low138 FPS137 FPS
medium107 FPS118 FPS
high94 FPS107 FPS
ultra80 FPS85 FPS
4K
low80 FPS82 FPS
medium59 FPS68 FPS
high46 FPS56 FPS
ultra36 FPS42 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970 and Radeon R9 Fury

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970

The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury

The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
G3D Mark Score
9,640+1%
9,521
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1664
3584+115%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.92 TFLOPS
7.168 TFLOPS+83%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+18%
1000 MHz
ROPs
56
64+14%
TMUs
104
224+115%
L1 Cache
624 KB
896 KB+44%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 970 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
512 GB/s+129%
Bus Width
256-bit
4096-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
DirectX
12 (FL 12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
Encoder
NVENC 2nd gen
VCE 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo VP6
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
TDP
150W-45%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
267mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
65°C-19%
Perf/Watt
64.3+86%
34.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 40.1% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce GTX 970 offers 69.4% better value. The Radeon R9 Fury is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 970Radeon R9 Fury
MSRP
$329-40%
$549
Performance per Dollar
29.3+69%
17.3
Codename
GM204
Fiji
Release
September 19 2014
July 10 2015
Ranking
#269
#274