
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 230W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 230W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro WX 8200 better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 XT make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 8200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 142 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon Pro WX 8200

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442 | 12,615+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 55.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-43% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+75% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 49.9% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 97.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-50% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9+98% | 12.6 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #215 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













