
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Radeon RX 5700M

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442 | 12,669+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 7.926 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 1720 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 32.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-28% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+36% | 70.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













