
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 260W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌300% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 260W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Tesla T10
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 296.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 260W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌300% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 260W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla T10 better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 XT make more sense than Tesla T10?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Tesla T10

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

Tesla T10
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442 | 12,558 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+87% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-50% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+98% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 75% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 295.2% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-75% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9+295% | 6.3 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #215 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













