GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅67.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 472.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
167.8% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅67.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 472.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
167.8% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Pro WX 4100?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1650 averages 67.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, 113.7% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $250 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 67.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 113.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 472.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro WX 4100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 4100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $399 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	94 FPS	41 FPS
medium	83 FPS	26 FPS
high	70 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	28 FPS
medium	74 FPS	17 FPS
high	60 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	10 FPS
medium	39 FPS	7 FPS
high	27 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	136 FPS	88 FPS
medium	113 FPS	57 FPS
high	94 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	42 FPS
medium	62 FPS	30 FPS
high	44 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	11 FPS
medium	27 FPS	9 FPS
high	21 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	323 FPS	166 FPS
medium	283 FPS	133 FPS
high	205 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	124 FPS
medium	202 FPS	99 FPS
high	151 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	83 FPS
medium	117 FPS	66 FPS
high	79 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
1080p
low	261 FPS	148 FPS
medium	211 FPS	115 FPS
high	191 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	107 FPS
medium	158 FPS	85 FPS
high	135 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	61 FPS
medium	74 FPS	47 FPS
high	65 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Radeon Pro WX 4100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 3,682 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 113.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	7,869+114%	3,682
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+21%	2.46 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+39%	1201 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+250%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+43%	73.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 62.7% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 473.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).