
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($3,999 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$3,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7900
2023RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($3,999 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$3,999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 6000 Ada Generation better than Radeon PRO W7900?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7900 make more sense than RTX 6000 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 813 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 471 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 945 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 775 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 358 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 946 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 801 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 714 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 456 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7900 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7900 scores 28,211 and the RTX 6000 Ada Generation reaches 28,454 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7900 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2495 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 96 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 568.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,211 | 28,454 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 18176+196% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 61.32 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2495 MHz | 2505 MHz |
| ROPs | 192 | 192 |
| TMUs | 384 | 568+48% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 17.8 MB+493% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 96 | 142+48% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 48 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 11.1% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s | 960 GB/s+11% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7900 draws 295W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 1.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W-2% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.6 | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The Radeon PRO W7900 costs 41.2% less ($2800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W7900 offers 69% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7900 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999-41% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.1+69% | 4.2 |
| Codename | Navi 31 | AD102 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #26 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












