
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅9.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅9.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than Radeon PRO W7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7800 make more sense than Radeon PRO W7900?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 918 FPS | 945 FPS |
| medium | 762 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 676 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 709 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 881 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 732 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 671 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 583 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 445 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 317 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon PRO W7900

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180 | 28,211+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480 | 6144+37% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz+1% | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 192+50% |
| TMUs | 280 | 384+37% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 96+37% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 864 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 12.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-12% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5+9% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The Radeon PRO W7800 costs 37.5% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7800 offers 53.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-38% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9+54% | 7.1 |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #28 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












