
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 20 GB).
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌178% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 32.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7900 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 20 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Radeon RX 7900 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 20 GB).
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 300W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.3 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌178% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 32.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 20 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 260W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900 XT better than Radeon PRO W7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7800 make more sense than Radeon RX 7900 XT?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 138 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 978 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 815 FPS | 870 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 917 FPS | 952 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 612 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 489 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 326 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 961 FPS | 930 FPS |
| medium | 803 FPS | 827 FPS |
| high | 728 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 612 FPS | 627 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 620 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon RX 7900 XT

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,996 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 28,996 — the Radeon RX 7900 XT leads by 6.7%. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7900 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 5,376 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 2394 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 84 (Radeon RX 7900 XT).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180 | 28,996+7% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480 | 5376+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS | 51.48 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz+5% | 2394 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 192+50% |
| TMUs | 280 | 336+20% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 84+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT has 20 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 800 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — a 38.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 320-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+60% | 20 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 800 GB/s+39% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 320-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XT).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 7900 XT's 300W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W-13% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 276mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5+8% | 96.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 XT launched at $899. The Radeon RX 7900 XT costs 64% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 32.3 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) — the Radeon RX 7900 XT offers 196.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W7800 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $899-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 32.3+196% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Navi 31 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #28 | #21 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












