
GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅17.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $689 less on MSRP ($1,810 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($1,810 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌63.5% higher power demand at 425W vs 260W.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 425W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌38.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,810 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,810 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅17.6% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $689 less on MSRP ($1,810 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($1,810 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 260W instead of 425W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌63.5% higher power demand at 425W vs 260W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌38.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,810 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,810 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU better than Radeon PRO W7800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 764 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 450 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 151 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 948 FPS | 918 FPS |
| medium | 776 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 702 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 291 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 955 FPS | 732 FPS |
| high | 813 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 841 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 724 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,102 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU scores 27,102 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 114 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 456 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,102 | 27,180 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 14592+226% | 4480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 73.54 TFLOPS+63% | 45.25 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2525 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+38% | 128 |
| TMUs | 456+63% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 14.3 MB+615% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 114+63% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU draws 425W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 48.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 425W | 260W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 63.8 | 104.5+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU launched at $1810 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU costs 27.6% less ($689 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU offers 37.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1810-28% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.0+38% | 10.9 |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | December 28 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #14 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












