
Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌207.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 32 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 32 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌207.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon AI PRO R9700 better than Radeon PRO W7900?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7900 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 191 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 911 FPS | 945 FPS |
| medium | 755 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 432 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 492 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 348 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 706 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 636 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 376 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 317 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon AI PRO R9700 and Radeon PRO W7900

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 128 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,589+1% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+17% | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 192+50% |
| TMUs | 256 | 384+50% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+33% | 6 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 96+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | 48 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+33% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 1.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 295W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.3 | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 costs 67.5% less ($2700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 209.9% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon AI PRO R9700 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1299-68% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0+210% | 7.1 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Navi 31 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #23 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












