G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,701 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 190.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅30.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
207.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,000 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).

Radeon AI PRO R9700

2025

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,701 less on MSRP ($1,299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 190.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅30.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.

Trade-offs

❌
207.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,000 MSRPvs$1,299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 5000 Ada Generation better than Radeon AI PRO R9700?

Yes. RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 30.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 5.9% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2025, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is about 207.9% more expensive on MSRP at $4,000 MSRP versus $1,299 MSRP, and you are getting 30.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon AI PRO R9700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon AI PRO R9700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon AI PRO R9700 make more sense than RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

Yes. Radeon AI PRO R9700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $1,299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The trade-off is that RTX 5000 Ada Generation currently gives you 5.9% higher G3D Mark and 30.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon AI PRO R9700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon AI PRO R9700 Benchmark Check

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	222 FPS	224 FPS
medium	206 FPS	196 FPS
high	179 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	163 FPS	117 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	200 FPS
medium	170 FPS	167 FPS
high	139 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	105 FPS
medium	115 FPS	89 FPS
high	92 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	53 FPS

Open Radeon AI PRO R9700 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	572 FPS	583 FPS
medium	452 FPS	482 FPS
high	351 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	405 FPS	491 FPS
medium	324 FPS	411 FPS
high	267 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	207 FPS	269 FPS
4K
low	205 FPS	287 FPS
medium	170 FPS	247 FPS
high	153 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	186 FPS

Open Radeon AI PRO R9700 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	911 FPS	911 FPS
medium	755 FPS	748 FPS
high	672 FPS	674 FPS
ultra	574 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	701 FPS	709 FPS
medium	576 FPS	580 FPS
high	501 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	435 FPS
4K
low	492 FPS	487 FPS
medium	406 FPS	403 FPS
high	348 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	289 FPS

Open Radeon AI PRO R9700 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	812 FPS	401 FPS
medium	706 FPS	350 FPS
high	636 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	558 FPS	258 FPS
1440p
low	639 FPS	291 FPS
medium	555 FPS	260 FPS
high	486 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	424 FPS	192 FPS
medium	376 FPS	165 FPS
high	341 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	297 FPS	101 FPS

Open Radeon AI PRO R9700 Open RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon AI PRO R9700 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Radeon AI PRO R9700

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 28,589 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 5.9%. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 128 Tensor cores vs 400.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	28,589	30,269+6%
Architecture	RDNA 4.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4096	12800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)	47.84 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock	2920 MHz+15%	2550 MHz
ROPs	128	176+38%
TMUs	256	400+56%
L2 Cache	8 MB	72 MB+800%
Ray Tracing Cores	64	100+56%
Tensor Cores	128	400+213%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 32 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6 ECC
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	8 MB	72 MB+800%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Encoder	VCN 5.0	NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder	VCN 5.0	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 draws 300W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon AI PRO R9700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation
TDP	300W	250W-17%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	16-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	95.3	121.1+27%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299 MSRP, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 costs 67.5% less ($2701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 189.5% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).