G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 371.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 110W instead of 295W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
344.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
❌168.2% higher power demand at 295W vs 110W.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

2019

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,099 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 371.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 110W instead of 295W, a 185W reduction.

Why buy it

✅84.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
344.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
❌168.2% higher power demand at 295W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) better than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 6.2% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 8 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023), and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is about $3,099 cheaper on MSRP at $900 MSRP versus $3,999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 6.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 371.9%. Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W7900 make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $3,999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel). The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) currently gives you 6.2% higher G3D Mark and lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 371.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	132 FPS	262 FPS
medium	113 FPS	242 FPS
high	97 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	246 FPS
medium	88 FPS	205 FPS
high	70 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	174 FPS
medium	41 FPS	145 FPS
high	30 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	100 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	256 FPS	813 FPS
medium	215 FPS	639 FPS
high	184 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	195 FPS	617 FPS
medium	161 FPS	495 FPS
high	139 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	320 FPS
medium	96 FPS	256 FPS
high	81 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	191 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	745 FPS	945 FPS
medium	615 FPS	775 FPS
high	547 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	477 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	714 FPS
medium	484 FPS	587 FPS
high	420 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	388 FPS	498 FPS
medium	312 FPS	412 FPS
high	255 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	202 FPS	292 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	259 FPS	946 FPS
medium	225 FPS	801 FPS
high	183 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	155 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	198 FPS	714 FPS
medium	176 FPS	604 FPS
high	140 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	505 FPS
medium	96 FPS	437 FPS
high	76 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	317 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and Radeon PRO W7900

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 6.2%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 320 Tensor cores.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	29,964+6%	28,211
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	6144+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.987 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+668%
Boost Clock	1560 MHz	2495 MHz+60%
ROPs	64	192+200%
TMUs	160	384+140%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	3 MB+20%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	40	96+140%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	48 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB	6 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	4th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 91.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	110W-63%	295W
Recommended PSU	650W-13%	750W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	3
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	272.4+185%	95.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 77.5% less ($3099 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 369% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).