
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅106.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅42.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (456 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌286.4% higher power demand at 425W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 425W, a 315W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 456), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅106.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅42.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (456 vs 320).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($900 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 425W, a 315W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$900 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ❌286.4% higher power demand at 425W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 456), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 D better than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 841 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 944 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 772 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 971 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 691 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 830 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 728 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 518 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 D and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 30,725 and the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) reaches 29,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 114 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 456 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,725+3% | 29,964 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 14592+470% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 73.54 TFLOPS+821% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+62% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+175% | 64 |
| TMUs | 456+185% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 14.3 MB+472% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 114+185% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 456+43% | 320 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 D comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 D draws 425W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 117.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 425W | 110W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 3 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 72.3 | 272.4+277% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 43.7% less ($699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 73.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $900-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2 | 33.3+73% |
| Codename | AD102 | TU104 |
| Release | December 28 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #14 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












