
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,400 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 334.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌41.7% higher power demand at 425W vs 300W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 425W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌337.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$1,599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $5,400 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 334.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.2 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 425W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌41.7% higher power demand at 425W vs 300W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌337.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$1,599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 D better than RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell make more sense than GeForce RTX 4090 D?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 841 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 199 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 944 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 772 FPS | 762 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 731 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 971 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 855 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 691 FPS | 697 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 830 FPS | 748 FPS |
| medium | 728 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 641 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 518 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 461 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 D and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 30,725 and the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell reaches 30,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 114 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 456 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,725 | 30,968 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 14592+4% | 14080 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 73.54 TFLOPS+10% | 66.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+6% | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 456+4% | 440 |
| L1 Cache | 14.3 MB+4% | 13.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 114+4% | 110 |
| Tensor Cores | 456+4% | 440 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4090 D is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 D comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 1.6% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 48 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+2% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB | 96 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 D draws 425W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 34.5% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 16-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 425W | 300W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 267mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 72.3 | 103.2+43% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999. The GeForce RTX 4090 D costs 77.2% less ($5400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 4.4 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 336.4% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599-77% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.2+336% | 4.4 |
| Codename | AD102 | GB202 |
| Release | December 28 2023 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #14 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












