G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

2022

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 108.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌52.5% higher power demand at 450W vs 295W.
❌25.8% longer card at 336mm vs 267mm.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
✅Draws 295W instead of 450W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 336mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
100.1% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

2022

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 108.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 24 GB).
✅Draws 295W instead of 450W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 267mm instead of 336mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌52.5% higher power demand at 450W vs 295W.
❌25.8% longer card at 336mm vs 267mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
100.1% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3090 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce RTX 3090 Ti averages 0.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 29,395 vs 28,211 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the overall package: you are getting DLSS Super Resolution.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7900 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, more VRAM at 48 GB instead of 24 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $1,999 MSRP. GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is about $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $3,999 MSRP, and you are getting 0.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (295W vs 450W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W7900 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3090 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p and 1440p maxed-out gaming, and still very capable for 4K in many titles. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (295W vs 450W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $3,999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3090 Ti currently gives you 4.2% higher G3D Mark and 0.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 108.4%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	271 FPS	262 FPS
medium	251 FPS	242 FPS
high	212 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	257 FPS	246 FPS
medium	215 FPS	205 FPS
high	169 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	174 FPS
medium	147 FPS	145 FPS
high	110 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	745 FPS	813 FPS
medium	608 FPS	639 FPS
high	483 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	571 FPS	617 FPS
medium	478 FPS	495 FPS
high	390 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	317 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	307 FPS	320 FPS
medium	265 FPS	256 FPS
high	238 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	929 FPS	945 FPS
medium	760 FPS	775 FPS
high	677 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	586 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	719 FPS	714 FPS
medium	589 FPS	587 FPS
high	512 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	438 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	498 FPS
medium	414 FPS	412 FPS
high	360 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	878 FPS	946 FPS
medium	807 FPS	801 FPS
high	710 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	647 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	700 FPS	714 FPS
medium	640 FPS	604 FPS
high	560 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	505 FPS	505 FPS
medium	466 FPS	437 FPS
high	417 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	331 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3090 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti scores 29,395 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1860 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 336 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	29,395+4%	28,211
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	10752+75%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	40 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	1860 MHz	2495 MHz+34%
ROPs	112	192+71%
TMUs	336	384+14%
L1 Cache	10.5 MB+250%	3 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	84	96+14%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	24 GB	48 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	1008 GB/s+17%	864 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit	384-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti draws 450W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 41.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 336mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3090 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	450W	295W-34%
Recommended PSU	850W	750W-12%
Power Connector	16-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	336mm	267mm
Height	140mm	111mm
Slots	3	3
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	65.3	95.6+46%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti costs 50% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 107% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).