
Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 400W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅12.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌84.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$1,899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 400W vs 250W.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($1,899 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 400W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅12.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌84.3% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$1,899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 400W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot better than Radeon Pro VII?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro VII still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro VII and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,264 | 13,182 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 3840 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 1967 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro VII comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro VII is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-38% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.1+61% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. The Radeon Pro VII costs 45.7% less ($1600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon Pro VII offers 84.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1899-46% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0+84% | 3.8 |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #194 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













