
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Why buy it
- ✅59.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌829% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌57.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 165W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,230 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 466.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 260W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7800
2023Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅59.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,230 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 466.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 260W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌829% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
- ❌57.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 165W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7800 better than Radeon RX 7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 918 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 762 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 676 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 709 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 881 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 732 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 671 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 583 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 445 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7800 and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7800 scores 27,180 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 63.9%. The Radeon PRO W7800 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 2525 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,180+64% | 16,581 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4480+119% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 45.25 TFLOPS+108% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2525 MHz | 2655 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 280+119% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70+119% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon PRO W7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+100% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7800 draws 260W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 44.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 165W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 104.5+4% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 89.2% less ($2230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 465.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7800 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $269-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 61.6+465% |
| Codename | Navi 31 | Navi 33 |
| Release | April 13 2023 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #28 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












