
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 16,443).
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+38.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌140.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 74% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 240mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+38.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 16,443).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌140.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W7600 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon PRO W7600

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the Radeon PRO W7600 leads by 38.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 16,443+38% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz | 2440 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 0% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 235mm | 240mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5 | 126.5+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 58.4% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 73.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+74% | 27.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #224 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













