
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7800M across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7800M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅70.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅70.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7800M across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7800M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7800M better than Radeon PRO W7600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 96 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the Radeon RX 7800M reaches 15,984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443+3% | 15,984 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3840+88% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+4% | 2335 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 32.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-28% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+42% | 88.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 32 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #123 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












