
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,100 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 463% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 400W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 64 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
2021Why buy it
- ✅40.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (64 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌456.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 400W vs 160W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,100 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 463% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 400W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅40.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (64 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 64 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌456.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 400W vs 160W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX 4000 better than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W6800X Duo make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 93 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 537 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 252 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 336 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 166 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 166 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,742 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo reaches 14,742 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925+1% | 14,742 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840 ×2+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+112% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1967 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 60 ×2+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo has 64 GB. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs VCN 3.0 (2x) (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo's 400W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-60% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3+153% | 36.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo launched at $4999. The Quadro RTX 4000 costs 82% less ($4100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) — the Quadro RTX 4000 offers 472.4% better value. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-82% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6+472% | 2.9 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #154 | #157 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












