
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅25.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
2024Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅25.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile scores 11,269 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1343 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 56 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,269 | 11,407+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.813 TFLOPS | 7.29 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1343 MHz | 2034 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.8 MB+260% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | 28+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-50% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 250.4+98% | 126.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












