GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6600M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1343 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021Core: 1224 MHzBoost: 2034 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024

Why buy it

  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 45W instead of 90W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

  • 25.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 100% higher power demand at 90W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 25.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2024, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021 and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 25.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.2% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W6600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 90W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W6600M. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W6600M currently gives you 1.2% higher G3D Mark and 25.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low107 FPS140 FPS
medium89 FPS118 FPS
high77 FPS103 FPS
ultra51 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS112 FPS
medium76 FPS92 FPS
high57 FPS75 FPS
ultra37 FPS52 FPS
4K
low37 FPS50 FPS
medium33 FPS43 FPS
high21 FPS32 FPS
ultra18 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low164 FPS243 FPS
medium141 FPS206 FPS
high112 FPS168 FPS
ultra88 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low120 FPS170 FPS
medium99 FPS142 FPS
high76 FPS112 FPS
ultra59 FPS88 FPS
4K
low72 FPS93 FPS
medium60 FPS78 FPS
high46 FPS65 FPS
ultra32 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low500 FPS513 FPS
medium406 FPS411 FPS
high338 FPS342 FPS
ultra254 FPS257 FPS
1440p
low349 FPS385 FPS
medium297 FPS308 FPS
high240 FPS257 FPS
ultra190 FPS192 FPS
4K
low227 FPS257 FPS
medium195 FPS205 FPS
high145 FPS171 FPS
ultra106 FPS128 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low238 FPS262 FPS
medium208 FPS231 FPS
high171 FPS186 FPS
ultra143 FPS157 FPS
1440p
low184 FPS199 FPS
medium164 FPS176 FPS
high130 FPS138 FPS
ultra106 FPS113 FPS
4K
low100 FPS117 FPS
medium83 FPS99 FPS
high66 FPS79 FPS
ultra52 FPS60 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and Radeon PRO W6600M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile scores 11,269 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1343 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 14 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 56 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score
11,269
11,407+1%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1792
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.813 TFLOPS
7.29 TFLOPS+51%
Boost Clock
1343 MHz
2034 MHz+51%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
56
112+100%
L1 Cache
1.8 MB+260%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
14
28+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
224 GB/s+75%
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
5+25%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCN 3.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 A MobileRadeon PRO W6600M
TDP
45W-50%
90W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
250.4+98%
126.7