G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

2024

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Why buy it

✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon Pro 5700 averages 9.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,269 vs 11,469 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5700 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020 and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 5700 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Pro 5700 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 9.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 130W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile make more sense than Radeon Pro 5700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 130W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5700. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5700 currently gives you 1.8% higher G3D Mark and 9.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	107 FPS	119 FPS
medium	89 FPS	105 FPS
high	77 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	108 FPS
medium	76 FPS	90 FPS
high	57 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	56 FPS
medium	33 FPS	50 FPS
high	21 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Radeon Pro 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	164 FPS	215 FPS
medium	141 FPS	180 FPS
high	112 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	143 FPS
medium	99 FPS	120 FPS
high	76 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	76 FPS
medium	60 FPS	65 FPS
high	46 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Radeon Pro 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	500 FPS	516 FPS
medium	406 FPS	413 FPS
high	338 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	254 FPS	258 FPS
1440p
low	349 FPS	387 FPS
medium	297 FPS	310 FPS
high	240 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	194 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	258 FPS
medium	195 FPS	206 FPS
high	145 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	129 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Radeon Pro 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	238 FPS	327 FPS
medium	208 FPS	282 FPS
high	171 FPS	233 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	194 FPS
1440p
low	184 FPS	270 FPS
medium	164 FPS	233 FPS
high	130 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	144 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	145 FPS
medium	83 FPS	116 FPS
high	66 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	83 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile Open Radeon Pro 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1343 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,269 points.

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile scores 11,269 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 4.813 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1343 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score	11,269	11,469+2%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.813 TFLOPS	6.221 TFLOPS+29%
Boost Clock	1343 MHz	1350 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile	Radeon Pro 5700
TDP	45W-65%	130W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	250.4+184%	88.2