G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

Why buy it

✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W5700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
12.5% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W5700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
12.5% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 4000 better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes. Quadro RTX 4000 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 20.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 3.8% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2018 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W5700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023), and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 4000 is about 12.5% more expensive on MSRP at $899 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 20.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro W5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 4000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro W5700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does Radeon Pro W5700 make more sense than Quadro RTX 4000?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $799 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 4000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 4000 currently gives you 3.8% higher G3D Mark and 20.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon Pro W5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 4000 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	129 FPS	150 FPS
medium	111 FPS	132 FPS
high	92 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	105 FPS	127 FPS
medium	87 FPS	104 FPS
high	67 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	74 FPS
medium	40 FPS	62 FPS
high	28 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	41 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open Radeon Pro W5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	270 FPS	226 FPS
medium	225 FPS	190 FPS
high	185 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	146 FPS
medium	168 FPS	122 FPS
high	136 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	78 FPS
medium	100 FPS	66 FPS
high	80 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	39 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open Radeon Pro W5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	672 FPS	647 FPS
medium	537 FPS	518 FPS
high	448 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	336 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	504 FPS	485 FPS
medium	403 FPS	388 FPS
high	336 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	252 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	336 FPS	324 FPS
medium	269 FPS	259 FPS
high	224 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	162 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open Radeon Pro W5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	248 FPS	332 FPS
medium	215 FPS	284 FPS
high	172 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	190 FPS	275 FPS
medium	168 FPS	236 FPS
high	132 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	147 FPS
medium	95 FPS	116 FPS
high	77 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	84 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 4000 Open Radeon Pro W5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon Pro W5700

Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1930 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
G3D Mark Score	14,925+4%	14,380
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2304	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.119 TFLOPS	8.893 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock	1545 MHz	1930 MHz+25%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	144
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCN 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 24.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	Radeon Pro W5700
TDP	160W-22%	205W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	93.3+33%	70.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 4000 launched at $899 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The Radeon Pro W5700 costs 11.1% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 offers 8.4% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).