
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500X make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Radeon Pro W5500X

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 7,351 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+7% | 7,351 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1536+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1757 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 96+71% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5500X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the Radeon Pro W5500X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 5+67% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-40% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+78% | 58.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75.1% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 329.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-75% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+329% | 12.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #345 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













