
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅7.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 685.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,369).
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌783.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅7.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 685.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,369).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌783.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 13,369 — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X leads by 12.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892 | 13,369+12% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS | 12.03 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+20% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 256+220% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+150% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 235mm | 0mm |
| Height | 124mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+71% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 88.7% less ($1951 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 683.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-89% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+684% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #224 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













